In the past few months, however, we have faced increasing difficulty in using these keywords to filter and browse the photo archive. Needless to say, this was tenuous and extensive labour. We have an extensive photo archive to which keywords were assigned along years on AdobeBridge. I arrived to this thread while looking for a solution I am facing in my work. I just downloaded DefaultFolder and houdahSpot and am looking forward to try them out and explore their functionalities. thank you for your priceless advice and recommendations. I am also wondering if the good people here who have offered help with suggestions like Default Folder, which I take to mean the software Default Folder X? I can't see how this helps us? But I will absolutely havd a look at it. No argument from me, I do NOT advocate for how I am doing this! I just wanted to associate myself with your question and see if you have learned anything new. ALL of the comments here, recommending not to use Bridge for this are SPOT ON. Bridge handles this with a smart folder that searches for the images that should be deleted. They all remain on the larger drive with no references to them in the Catalog. But that only deletes the images from the LR Catalog and the fast local drive. I manage deletions by using metadata to store which are set to be deleted forever and make sure that a Chronosync backup has run before actually purging the images. It works wonderfully, I can just point LightRoom to the larger volume when freeing up space on the smaller faster drive. Essentially I have a fast drive with my most current images backing up to a slower, larger drive. I use Bridge as you suggest and against the advice here because I have not found a better method to manage my workflow. Wondering if you have any updates on how you ended up. What about other files formats such as TIFF, JPEG, Word, PDF, Excel. I have looked at the usual suspects - Path Finder, Double Commander and Forklift - but have been very disappointed.Īre there any situations in which the use of Bridge just for browsing and perhaps assigning keywords to files could cause damage or loss of data?Īlso, what is the status today on the assingment of keywords to files by Bridge? I understand that for RAW image files Bridge creates an additional sidecar XMP files where information is save including keywords. It would be great to use Bridge to perform file operations (renaming, moving, copyingm, deleting, etc.) but this is not the primary reason why I thought Bridge would be a good choice for file browsing. Bridge is also great at this since you can assign as many keywords as necessary and then perform a 'filtered' search by simply clicking or selecting one or more keywords. My primary intention is to use an application to browse all my files or to choose them by keyword or tag. In other words, Bridge will display all the contents of a folder and also the contents of all folders contained in that root folder without displaying the folders themselves allowing you to see ALL files in one selected location or folder. Another great feature is the option to hide folders. Also Bridge allows the user (me) to choose the size of these thumbnails in gallery view, which is a big help. The advantage I found in bridge is the gallery view with thumbnais of files that help me easily identify them. Thank you for your reply and for all your recommendations. I have other applications that I also use but these are my essentials. When you are copying 10 files this is not much an issue but when you are doing 10,000+ it's essential. I use Chronosync to back A to B at least once a week unless I just did a major input into A. I have a 2nd 4 TB drive that I use to back up all of the files of the first drive so if Drive A fails, I have everything also on Drive B. For example, I have one 4 TB drive that I keep all of my photos and other documents on. This is more for maintaining large collections of files on multiple drives. It has helped me find files that would be completely lost otherwise.įor copying files from one drive to another, I could not imagine being without Chronosync. Work with this for 30 minutes and you'll never look back. For example, I cannot imagine running my Mac without Default Folder. Rather than try to replace the Finder, what I've done is to find other application that enhance the Finder. The fact that it can do more is somewhat if a serendipitous coincidence. Rather, it was designed to let you view, organize, rate, and work with your images. I agree with Luminographics in that I would not find Bridge to be an adequate Finder replacement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |